102
appominest ; he say that
The
ady
and inevitable inference appendixf to be drawn from that n correspondence is that the judges represented to MW. Sibbons
were
is his immediate superiors
therefore and as a
and therefore
Consequence
ttie
of
once
only madium
the
communication from
Rupreme Court with the Govenor-
through the Colaviel lecutory". In the strength of thus be cabunts that IW. Eitbous belief that there was in each understanding
fact any
مالک مه
ttare
103.
324
The Chef Justice calls an inevitable conclusion but it is possible that the virus thurs put forward by the Chief Justice in belober may be identical with those upon which the Yove num arrived at his decision in Eime.
123. To continue the along, no direch intimation of the decision of the Enstruer of Ime 30 was wuh & Mr. Gibbons (and indeed There is nothing to show that Mr. Ribbons was Expecting any decision or was lote aware that The Chief pratice was urging the Governor to fil (ppendix p. 83, any decision) but the Chief Justice sono rejussted 45 connunicate it. "To prevent any misconception
$
was is unfounded appendice for pandia p. 8r.onth this subject in future the Governor would be plad
in the
in
The pays
I do not en anything corresponduce to suggest thus inferecer wluch
ste
of Your Honour would communicate a copy of
Mis baller to the Regiohär "-
124
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.